Samsung 970 EVO revisão: Forte concorrência para o melhor orçamento NVMe SSD

Samsung’s EVO series has owned the title of fastest TLC-based M.2 NVMe SSD since there has been such a thing. But unfortunately for the company, that distinction went the way of the dodo with the release of the WD’s game-changing Black NVMe no início deste mês.

Samsung’s response? The brand new 970 EVO. Contudo, it’s a case of darn close, but no cigar—the Samsung 970 EVO outperforms the WD in several tests, but falls short in sustained write performance with larger amounts of data. Dito isto, the shortfall is liable to affect few users.

Especificações, price and warranty

a Samsung 970 EVO is your standard M.2, 2280 (22 millimeters wide, 80 mm long), NVMe (Non-Volatile Memory Express) PCIe x4 solid state drive. That x4 means it can utilize four PCIe lanes for roughly 4GBps of available bandwidth, assuming a PCIe 3.0 conexão.

The drive uses Samsung’s 64-layer TLC (Triple-Level Cell/3-bit) NAND and is available in $120/250GB, $230/500GB, $450/1tuberculose, and $850/2TB capacities. In terms of both price and capacity, that puts it in direct competition the aforementioned WD Black NVMe.

You may see Samsung refer to its TLC NAND as 3-bit MLC. MLC stands for Multi-Level Cell, so by the letter of the language, they are correct. Contudo, the acronym MLC is generally reserved for the faster-writing 2-bit NAND to which it was first applied. Long story short—the 970 EVO’s NAND é what is commonly referred to as TLC.

Semantics aside, to overcome TLC’s write-performance handicap (writing three bits simply takes longer than writing one or two), the Samsung 970 EVO treats some of the TLC as SLC (Single-Level Cell/1-bit) by writing only single bit. This creates a much faster cache as shown in the chart below.

970 evo1 Samsung
Huge thanks to Samsung for this chart which shows exactly the amount of cache available for sustained writes, as well as what the speeds drop to when off cache.

Kudos to Samsung for providing the information above. Most companies won’t talk about the amount of NAND cache they employ in their TLC drives, even though it becomes readily apparent during testing. Note that TurboWrite is the Samsung’s name for intelligently adjusting the NAND cache size for the amount and type of data being written.

a Samsung 970 EVO also features DRAM cache to accelerate performance: 512MB on the 250GB and 500GB drives, 1GB on the 1TB drive, and 2GB on the 2TB drive.

ssd 970 without label fron back Samsung
The front and back of the 970 EVO without the label.

o 970 EVO is backed by a 5-year limited warranty and rated for 150 TBW (TeraBytes Written) per 250GB of capacity.

atuação

I’m no Carnac the Magnificent, but it wasn’t that hard to predict the 970 EVO’s performance after testing the Samsung 970 Pró. The 500GB EVO we tested performed on par with the 970 Pro and WD Black NVMe, and a little faster on one or two tests—right up until the time that it had to write a very large amount of data. Sustained write performance halved at about the 22GB mark of our 48GB large file copy test when the DRAM and NAND caches were exhausted. You can view the phenomenon below.

970 evo 500 slowdonw IDG
Though most users will write this amount of data rarely, se alguma vez, it can be disconcerting to see the

Reading the following charts, you’ll notice that Samsung’s pricier 970 Pro (dark blue) is clearly that fastest M.2 NVMe SSD available to consumers. But between the cheaper 970 EVO and the WD Black NVMe, it’s pretty much a toss-up until the 48GB copy tests, where the WD Black proved unquestionably the faster sustained writer of the two.

cdm 6 970 evo IDG
CDM6 preferred the WD Black NVMe to the 970 EVO on just about every test. Both fell shy of the 970 Pró

CrystalDiskMark 6, which highlights small file performance with various queue and thread depths, thought more highly of the WD Black NVMe (shown in gold in the above chart). AS SSD 2.0 (below) on the other hand, liked the Samsung 970 EVO (violet) better when it came to small writes. Go figure.

as ssd 2 970 evo IDG
Samsung

It was on our copy tests where differences between the Samsung 970 EVO and the WD Black became readily apparent. Ainda, this will only affect you on those rare occasions (for most users) when you copy large amounts of data, such as a game directory or a folder of virtual machines. If you go for one the 1TB or 2TB capacities, you’re unlikely to run into the sustained write performance decline at all. Samsung’s TurboWrite chart above will tell you exactly at what point the operation will fall out of the cache.

48gb 970 evo IDG
The 500GB 970 EVO we tested ran out of cache, and steam for copying around the 20GB mark and its time suffered as a result.

Conclusão

This is a tough call that’s mostly dictated on the performance differences at each capacity. In the 250GB and 500GB capacities, the WD Black NVMe has a slight edge for performance overall.

At 1TB and 2TB, where the Samsung 970 EVO’s larger cache greatly reduces the chances of being overrun, it’s mostly a draw. That means your buying decision should mostly come down to which drive has the lower price when you’re shopping. PCWorld’s guide to the best SSDs has all the information you need to know about buying a new drive, including recommendations for top drives.

Fonte

anúncios

Deixe uma resposta

Este site usa Akismet para reduzir o spam. Saiba como seus dados comentário é processado.

Nós usamos cookies para lhe dar a melhor experiência on-line. Ao concordar você aceitar o uso de cookies de acordo com nossa política de Privacidade.